Showing posts with label Focus On Global South. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Focus On Global South. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Think-Tank Insists U.S. Plays Combat Role In Philippines

MANILA, Philippines (Mindanao Examiner / September 9, 2008) - An international think-tank that has been monitoring US military activities in the Philippines on Tuesday weighed in on the resurgence of the controversy issue whether the American soldiers are engaged in combat or not.

The US Embassy denied the American were forces were involved in any combat operation in the Philippines.

But Herbert Docena, researcher of Bangkok-based Focus on the Global South, said US troops are allegedly engaged in actual combat in Mindanao.

“According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, ‘combat’ means ‘a fight or contest between individuals or groups’,” he pointed out.

“The US itself has admitted that its troops accompany Filipino troops in their operations, that its spy planes tell the Philippine military where to strike, that it helps evacuate Filipino soldiers when they’re hit, that its ‘humanitarian assistance’ is meant to ‘win hearts and minds’ – all these are ‘combat’ actions by definition because they are part of a fight or contest in which the goal is to defeat enemies,” he said in a statement.

Docena, who has authored two widely quoted reports on the US military in the Philippines, pointed out that information about US troops being involved in combat have been accumulating through the months:

·In June 2002, US troops exchanged gunfire with alleged Abu Sayyaf members, according to a US military publication.[i]

·In February this year, Gen Ruben Rafael, Filipino commander in Sulu, admitted to the Los Angeles Times that it was the US military crew of a US P-3 Orion spy plane that provided information that led to a raid in which 8 civilians, including two children and a pregnant woman, were killed.[ii]

·Last August 12, a US military-contracted helicopter went to evacuate Filipino soldiers in an encounter in Basilan, as confirmed by the Philippine military.[iii]

·On August 17, four American soldiers were seen and photographed helping Filipino troops recover unexploded bombs in North Cotabato.[iv]

·On August 31, a US soldier was among those reported to be with a Philippine military convoy that was attacked in Sulu.[v]

·Last September 6, Lt. Col Agane Adriatico of the Philippine Army admitted that US troops have been providing technical support in operations against the Moro Islamic Liberation Front.[vi]

“In light of all these information, the US and Philippine governments’ attempts to limit the definition of the word ‘combat’ does not make sense linguistically. It only makes sense politically, what with the legal prohibition against US troops being involved in combat,” Docena said. “To accept the common-sense definition of combat is to admit that US troops action in the southern Philippines is unconstitutional.”

Docena pointed out that US troops themselves refer to their mission in the south as “counter-insurgency” or “unconventional warfare” – military terms that encompass “combat.”

Docena stressed that the US military’s own Army Field Manual states: “Military power is not limited to acts of violence and overt hostilities to achieve strategic objectives… The principles of war apply to the full range of operations, specifically where the use of force is more selective and where restraint and non-lethal aspects of power are dominant.”[vii]

“This,” Docena claims, “shows that even the US military understands the common-sense definition of combat.”

As for Secretary Ermita’s claim that the US troops are not here permanently because they “come and go”, Docena said: “That would be like saying that US never had permanent bases in the country from 1946 to 1991 since US troops assigned to those bases also came and went on rotation.”

Docena also cited the following references: Focus on the Global South reports:'At the Door of all the East': The Philippines in United States Military Strategy, November 2007 www.focusweb.org/at-the-door-of-all-the-east.pdf

Unconventional Warfare: Are US Special Forces Engaged in an “Offensive War” in the Philippines?, March 2007

http://focusweb.org/downloads/download/reports/unconventional-warfare:-are-us-special-forces-engaged-in-an-%E2%80%98offensive-war%E2%80%99-in-the-philippines?.html
NOTES[i] Army Magazine, “News Call,” August 1, 2002; John Hendren, “Rebels Shoot at US Troops in the Philippines, Los Angeles Times, June 18, 2002

[ii] Paul Watson, “US role in Philippine Raid Questioned,” Los Angeles Times, March 9, 2008

[iii] Nikko Dizon, Tarra Quismundo, “AFP to media: Allow our soldiers to die with dignity,” Philippine Daily Inquirer, August 15, 2008

[iv] Carolyn Arguillas, “US troops join search for unexploded bombs in conflict area,” Mindanews, August 18, 2008

[v] “Guam National Guard soldier safe, unharmed after rebel attack in Philippines,” www.guampdn, August 31, 2008

[vi] Rex T. Dumarpa, “Army says US forces provide tech support in hunt for Bravo,” Philippine Information Agency, September 5, 2008

[vii] US Army Field Manual 3-07-20, pp 1-15.

Friday, September 05, 2008

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Where Are The US’ Secret Bases In Philippines?

US gov’t lists RP as hosting “cooperative security locations” -- a category of US bases -- but gov’t has neither announced their existence nor disclosed their locations.

MANILA, Philippines (Mindanao Examiner / Nov. 21, 2007) - Revealing that the Philippines hosts US “cooperative security locations” (CSLs) -- a new category of US military bases, a new report launched by an international research institute raised the question: Where are these bases in the Philippines?

In a little-reported event, the US’ Overseas Basing Commission, a body created by the US Congress to review the ongoing realignment of US military presence around the world, has listed the Philippines as among the countries where the US has been developing CSLs.

The Philippine government, the report noted, has neither announced its decision to allow the opening of these CSLs nor has it revealed where these bases are located.

Entitled ‘At the Door of All the East’: The Philippines in US Military Strategy, the report is published by Focus on the Global South, an international policy research organization based at the Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Thailand, with country offices in Manila and Mumbai.

According to the Pentagon, CSLs are categorized as US military installations that are nominally owned by host governments, but are to be provided for the US’ use when needed.

They would most likely be ran and maintained by host-nation personnel or even private contractors. They are useful for pre-positioning logistics support or as venues for joint operations with host militaries.

CSLs are also called “lily pads” intended to allow the US to hop on from their larger bases to their destinations rapidly when necessary. With their low profile, they are envisioned not to attract the level of attention that has fueled domestic opposition to US military presence in many places around the world.

Though the Philippine government has neither acknowledged nor identified the locations of these bases in the Philippines, the report quotes a prominent American journalist and author who has visited such facilities as suggesting that one such CSL is in Mactan island in Cebu province, once a base for P3 Orion reconnaissance planes operating in Mindanao.

Other possible leads offered for those with the capacity to probe further include the Subic Bay port, the Clark Airfield, and the General Santos City airport.

Comparing the amounts of US military assistance countries in East Asia get with their own military expenditures, the Philippines stands out for having the largest percentage of US military assistance relative to its military budget, according to a report by the Focus on Global South.

This is an indication that the Philippines is the most dependent among all recipients of US military aid in East Asia, its report said.

The report shows that, since 9/11, the Philippines has been by far the largest recipient of US military assistance in all of East Asia. In fact, between 2002-2005, the country obtained approximately 85% of the total allocated to Southeast Asia.

Its $54 million annual average is over ten times more than the next biggest recipient, Thailand, another close US ally, which got an average of $4 million annually during that period, it said in a statement sent to the Mindanao Examiner.

At the same time, the Philippines has one of the lowest military budgets in the region. In absolute terms, the Philippines tops only Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos in average annual military spending from 1988 to 2005.

At $814 million a year (in constant 2005 prices and exchange rates), the Philippines’ is just a little over one-fifth of top spender Singapore and one-third of Indonesia and Thailand. As a percentage of annual economic output, the Philippines’ average annual military spending is the lowest in the region.

Taking into account the share of US military aid as a proportion of the total military budget, the Philippines is relatively the most dependent on US military assistance among countries in the region, if such can be gauged by comparing how much a country gets from the US and how much it is spending.

By this measure, from 1988 to 2005, US military assistance was equivalent to over 8% of the Philippines’ average annual military expenditure. This is far larger than any other country in the region, much more than that of another close US ally, Thailand, for which US military is only 0.4% of its annual military expenditure.(Herbert Docena)